Correction: Integrating music and nature: a scoping review of research on interventions involving both music- and nature-based strategies for mental health and wellbeing.
Authors: Frontiers Production Office
Journal: Frontiers in human neuroscience
mental health
psychology
open access
Abstract
Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is an increasingly recognized cause of hip pain and dysfunction in young and middle‐aged patients., Initial management of FAIS is typically conservative with multimodal pain control, activity modification, and physical therapy. However, as symptoms progress and nonoperative measures are no longer sufficient, operative management with hip arthroscopy, including osteoplasty and labral repair, is typically indicated., Given the increased recognition of FAIS and thus increased rates of hip arthroscopy, there has been an increased interest in quantifying patient‐reported outcomes (PROs)., A number of hip‐specific PRO measures are commonly used, with the most common being the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)., Previous studies have shown strong relationships between hip‐specific PRO scores., There has been a growing interest in examining patient function postoperatively in more than just hip‐specific outcomes by looking at global pain scores and general health/quality of life metrics., Two common metrics that have been used are the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain as well as the 12‐Item Short Form Survey (SF‐12) for general health status., However, there has been little research into the relationship between SF‐12 and VAS scores with the PRO scores mHHS and HOOS., In the age of comprehensive patient assessment and care, evaluating the patient as a whole as opposed to focusing solely on limb‐specific outcomes is particularly salient. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationships between hip‐specific PROs metrics and general health and pain measures before and after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. We hypothesized that the hip‐specific outcomes, mHHS and HOOS, would both have strong, statistically significant, and clinically meaningful relationships with the general health metrics and pain scores.